Обоснование экспертных выводов в судебно-медицинской документации

УДK 343.148; 340.6

В.Л. Попов
ГБОУ ВО "Государственный университет морского и речного флота им. адм. С.О. Макарова", г. Санкт-Петербург

Приведена нормативная документация, регламентирующая обоснование выводов в судебно-медицинских экспертных документах. Показаны основные ошибки экспертов при обосновании выводов, а также их причины. Перечислены основные принципы экспертного исследования. Изложены пути дальнейшего изучения проблемы.

Ключевые слова: судебно-медицинская документация, выводы, обоснование.

THE RATIONALE FOR THE EXPERT’S CONCLUSIONS IN FORENSIC DOCUMENTATION V.L.Popov
Federal Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping, Saint Petersburg

The article presents regulatory documents governing the justification of conclusions of forensic medical expert documents. It shows the main mistakes of the examiners in substantiating the conclusions, and the reasons for them. The basic principles of expert research, following which is the methodological basis for the full reasoning of the conclusions. The dialectic of following the basic principles is that on the one hand, they are applied in a certain sequence, and on the other -the expert effect depends on the mandatory adherence to the whole set of principles. The author emphasizes that the dominant feature in the expert work is the search, identification and fixation (description, photographic, etc.) of the facts that will be required to justify the conclusions. The truth of the established facts must be justified -that is, reasoned and motivated. Ways of further studying of a problem are stated.

Keywords: forensic documentation, conclusions, justification.